Tash Peterson's finances in the spotlight at defamation trial

10 months ago 28

By Padraig Collins For Daily Mail Australia

Published: 23:59 EDT, 13 June 2024 | Updated: 23:59 EDT, 13 June 2024

A defamation tribunal lawsuit taken against a notorious vegan activistic has exposed the tremendous magnitude of wealth she earns from OnlyFans.

Tash Peterson is making truthful overmuch wealth posting semi-clad photos of herself to OnlyFans that she is among its apical 4 per cent of earners, WA's Supreme Court has heard.

The tribunal was told Ms Peterson earned much than $400,000 successful the 2021-2022 fiscal year, but declared conscionable $70,000 successful concern net to Australian Tax Office.

When her slope statements were mentioned successful court, she could lone constituent to 1 $100 donation to an carnal charity, the West Australian reported.

Ms Peterson, her fellow Jack Higgs and her institution V-Gan Booty are being sued by the owners of Bicton Veterinary Clinic implicit a video they enactment connected societal media successful September 2021, accusing the session of promoting 'animal slavery'.

A tribunal lawsuit taken against notorious vegan activistic Tash Peterson (pictured) has exposed the tremendous magnitude of wealth she earns from OnlyFans and however small she seems to springiness to carnal rights causes

Ms Peterson (pictured) is making truthful overmuch wealth posting semi-clad photos of herself to OnlyFans that she is among its apical 4 per cent of earners, WA's Supreme Court has heard

Dr Kay McIntosh and her hubby Andrew assertion the video damaged their estimation and that Ms Peterson and Mr Higgs created it to get publicity and marque money.

They assertion Ms Peterson utilized her vegan stunts to get radical to motion up to her OnlyFans relationship and wage her for entree to her risque photos.

The video, which is inactive connected Ms Peterson's societal media account, also accused Dr McIntosh of being an 'animal abuser' who 'eats her ain patients'.

Chief Justice Peter Quinlan said helium had  discovered different grounds existed that showed V-Gan Booty had submitted a taxation instrumentality for 2021-2022 of $267,000.

The tribunal heard that taxation instrumentality was created by Ms Peterson's accountant.

Martin Bennett, the McIntoshs' lawyer, said that fig inactive near astir $130,000 'missing' from that fiscal year.

V-Gan Booty was acceptable up successful December 2021 connected the proposal of Ms Peterson's accountant, owed to the wealth she was making from her OnlyFans account, which had been acceptable up astir 7 months earlier.

Mr Bennett suggested the summation successful subscribers coincided with precocious illustration stunts Ms Peterson carried out, including astatine luxury stores, Gucci and Louis Vuitton.

The tribunal was told Ms Peterson (pictured) earned much than $400,000 successful the 2021-2022 fiscal year, but declared conscionable $70,000 successful concern net to Australian Tax Office - though this fig was aboriginal disputed

It was claimed successful tribunal that Ms Peterson (pictured) utilized her vegan stunts to get radical to motion up to her OnlyFans relationship and wage her for entree to her risque photos

Ms Peterson, disagreed, saying the crisp emergence successful subscriptions came aft a vdeo astir her OnlyFans relationship was posted to YouTube.

Though the activistic was lone capable to constituent to 1 definite donation to an carnal rights foundation connected her slope statement, she said she besides utilized a PayPal relationship to marque donations.

Some of the payments connected her slope connection included receipts for buying a caller car, a vacation successful Italy, transportation of wealth to her fellow and a 'jet skis loan' to her begetter and brother, the tribunal heard.

The lawsuit continues successful the WA Supreme Court.

Article From: www.dailymail.co.uk
Read Entire Article



Note:

We invite you to explore our website, engage with our content, and become part of our community. Thank you for trusting us as your go-to destination for news that matters.

Certain articles, images, or other media on this website may be sourced from external contributors, agencies, or organizations. In such cases, we make every effort to provide proper attribution, acknowledging the original source of the content.

If you believe that your copyrighted work has been used on our site in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please contact us promptly. We are committed to addressing and rectifying any such instances

To remove this article:
Removal Request