Kangana Ranaut reacts to past comments on Urmila Matondkar: 'No other country treats porn stars with such respect as we do...you can ask Sunny Leone'

1 year ago 28

In 2020, Kangana Ranaut had caused a stir when she had made a scathing remark about

Urmila Matondkar

by using the terms like 'soft porn' and 'pornstar'. During the Times Now Summit 2024 on Wednesday, Kangana addressed the

controversy

stating that the respect given to

porn stars

in India, citing

Sunny Leone

as an example, surpasses that received anywhere else in the world.

Regarding her earlier statement about Urmila, Kangana clarified that she was responding to Matondkar's question about the basis on which the BJP was entertaining her. She then pointed out the different forms of art, distinguishing between sensational and intellectually stimulating art.
"Is soft porn or pornstar an objectionable term? No! It is not an objectionable term. It is a word that is not socially acceptable. Humare desh mein jitna pornstar ko respect milta hai, puchiye (former adult film star) Sunny Leone se, utna respect poore world mein kisiko nahi mil sakta (No other country treats porn stars with such respect as we do...you can ask Sunny Leone," Kangana said. I was asked to comment on

Urmila

ji (Matondkar) asking on what basis was the BJP considering me for a foray into politics. That was her question. I believe there are different realms of art. Sensational art, the one we refer to as massy art, which only titillates or physically stimulates you, that is also an art form. However, that can never be superior to the art that is intellectually motivating, one which stimulates your mind," Kangana said.

From calling Urmila Matondkar 'soft porn star' to comparing Mumbai to PoK, top 6 controversies of Kangana Rananut

She continued, "I personally believe that I belong to that balanced cinema artiste tribe. I have never done

item numbers

. So, all I said was that if she could join a party (Congress) with her kind of filmography, then I have a more ravishing body of work. In fact, what I am saying is why being a pornstar socially acceptable and not a prostitute? Why do we have this kind of mindset for

prostitutes

while we accept pornstars socially? Is it because they have more money? Do they have (more) glamour? We don't treat prostitutes the same way as pornstars."

Kangana also defended her choice of words, questioning why terms like 'tandoori-murgi,' 'item girl,' and 'Sheila ki Jawani' are accepted while others are seen as violations. She expressed that her intent was not to shame Urmila but to address the roles individuals are comfortable with.
She reiterated her stance against the sexualization of children through item numbers and advocated for adult content to be labeled as such and not shown on television for general consumption. She emphasized the importance of having a genuine desire to be an actress and the audience's role in choosing leaders.
In 2020, Urmila hit out at Kangana for allegedly disrespecting

Jaya Bachchan

, after the veteran actor claimed that the entire film industry was being 'tarnished' in a 2020 speech in Parliament.

Article From: timesofindia.indiatimes.com
Read Entire Article



Note:

We invite you to explore our website, engage with our content, and become part of our community. Thank you for trusting us as your go-to destination for news that matters.

Certain articles, images, or other media on this website may be sourced from external contributors, agencies, or organizations. In such cases, we make every effort to provide proper attribution, acknowledging the original source of the content.

If you believe that your copyrighted work has been used on our site in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please contact us promptly. We are committed to addressing and rectifying any such instances

To remove this article:
Removal Request