‘Fan of whiskey’: Courtroom banter between Chief Justice and senior lawyer

1 year ago 17

A Supreme Court hearing on industrial alcohol took a surprisingly "spirited" turn with Chief Justice DY Chandrachud ribbing senior advocate Dinesh Dwivedi after he apologised for showing up with "colourful grey hair".

Dinesh Dwivedi and CJI Chandrachud

Senior advocate Dinesh Dwivedi and CJI Chandrachud engaged in light banter during a hearing on industrial alcohol.

Devika Bhattacharya

New Delhi,UPDATED: Apr 3, 2024 14:25 IST

A Supreme Court hearing on industrial alcohol took a surprisingly "spirited" turn on Tuesday. In a candid exchange, Chief Justice DY Chandrachud couldn't resist a playful jab at senior advocate Dinesh Dwivedi after he showed up to the courtroom with colourful hair.

"Apologies for my colourful grey hair," Dwivedi began, blaming the hues on overzealous Holi celebrations and grandchildren. "This is the disadvantage of having too many children and grandchildren around. You can't save yourself."

Chief Justice Chandrachud, with a smile, countered, "Nothing to do with the alcohol?"

Dwivedi, clearly a man who wears his love for the amber nectar on his sleeve (or rather, in his glass), chuckled and confessed, "It does. Holi means partly alcohol... and I must confess... I am a fan of whiskey."

#CourtDialogues: Watch this candid exchange between CJI DY Chandrachud and Senior Advocate Dinesh Dwivedi during the SC nine-judge bench hearing today.

Dinesh Dwivedi: Apologies for my colourful hair. It is because of Holi. This is the disadvantage of having lot of kids andâ€æ pic.twitter.com/wPdx2T6Axf — Law Today (@LawTodayLive) April 2, 2024

Laughter rippled through the courtroom as the nine-judge Constitution Bench, grappling with the serious issue of overlapping powers between the Centre and state governments on industrial alcohol production, witnessed this lighthearted exchange.

The real question at hand? Whether "industrial alcohol" is the same beast as everyone's favourite weekend tipple, "intoxicating liquor."

Advocate Dwivedi, appearing for the Uttar Pradesh, argued that all forms of alcohol, from the industrial kind to the celebratory kind (think whiskey, vodka, the whole gang), fall under state control.

One judge, clearly not unfamiliar with the revenue-generating power of liquor, quipped, "The argument of states is that whether intoxicating drinks bring joy to human beings or not, it should bring joy to state revenue."

Another judge also engaged in light banter with Dwivedi. "You explained how some alcohol requires ageing to improve taste, while others don't; some are fair in colour while others are dark. Would a material exhibit help?" – a question that sent the court into peals of laughter.

While the legalities of industrial alcohol may seem dry, this Supreme Court hearing proved that even the highest court can have a moment of levity, all thanks to a touch of Holi cheer and a self-confessed whiskey lover.

Published By:

Devika Bhattacharya

Published On:

Apr 3, 2024

Article From: www.indiatoday.in
Read Entire Article



Note:

We invite you to explore our website, engage with our content, and become part of our community. Thank you for trusting us as your go-to destination for news that matters.

Certain articles, images, or other media on this website may be sourced from external contributors, agencies, or organizations. In such cases, we make every effort to provide proper attribution, acknowledging the original source of the content.

If you believe that your copyrighted work has been used on our site in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please contact us promptly. We are committed to addressing and rectifying any such instances

To remove this article:
Removal Request